Posts Tagged ‘Supreme Court’

Legislate From The Bench

May 16, 2011

Here’s your rights. Here’s your rights on dope. That’s what it feels like when I hear that the police can come into your house for no apparent reason. The Indiana Supreme Court ruled that a homeowner has no right to resist unlawful police entry into their home. I am not making this up, look here. And that’s from the largest and most trusted media company in northwest Indiana. I just saw that at the top of the page and was compelled to include it here.

Back to the subject, what is meant by “modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence” ? Sounds like legal BS to me. Sounds like we might be legislating from the ol’ bench. This is the kind of thing these dang lib judges have no problem with. Instead of doing their job and upholding the law as it exists they want to twist the meaning of the law to fit their gay agenda. This “modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence” is exactly what I’m talking about here.

Does anyone happen to remember the Fourth Amendment from my series? In case it has slipped your mind here it is; “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.”

Are there any “gray areas” that you can see? Any room for “modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence” standing out here? It sounds to me like you can just step out of your vehicle and lock the door when you get pulled over and they have no recourse. This is the Constitution here, not some doped up judges writings. You know? I was feeling pretty good until I heard this crap, and I have been kind of sick ever since. This is a bad place we are going to. Mark that down because here is the next piece of crap.

The Kentucky Supreme Court rules that a police officer who knocks on a door loudly in search of illegal drugs, and then hears sounds indicating evidence is being destroyed may break down the door and enter without a warrant. Aren’t Kentucky and Indiana right across the river from each other? Maybe they’re drinking the same tainted water or something. All I know is there is a lot of crap coming from this particular area right now.

The things we do to be safe from those evil drugs. Oops. We have many corporations hawking them as we speak on radio, television, and in our newspapers. What the heck (WTH)? Anyway, one thing I know is when you’re in Kentucky, if you’re taking a dump and the police come knocking, DON’T FLUSH! Could be some kind of modern Fourth Amendment jurisprudence jubejube going on there. Until next time, screw environmentalists.

South Dakotans Must Own Gun

February 1, 2011

Now this is my kind of law. Five South Dakota Legislators have introduced a bill that requires all South Dakotans to own a firearm. I think I’ll be moving there. Don’t believe it? Look here. Ok, so it’s not what you had in mind but it is true. If we’re going to have a mandated purchase I’m going with this one not some sleazy insurance that should be outlawed instead of mandated.

Yes. It is a protest move against obamacare, and when this is struck down for forcing a citizen to buy a product it will set a precedence for obamacare. This is great work from the legislators here. This is the kind of thing we need going on all over the country if we are ever going to beat the libs. Hit them from all sides with the most far-reaching things you can come up with. Get people used to seeing this kind of thing again. A while back I said they (the libs) were like a retarded Energizer Bunny. Well now we’re starting to show some of that and it’s great. WELL DONE!

With the Federal Judge ruling for the Constitution in Florida we have a real movement going on here. That’s what happened down there you know? That Judge ruled FOR the Constitution, not against obamacare. That, with this, is the kind of thinking we have to keep going. Here‘s the Florida ruling. I think Limbaugh hammered this home today about how good this ruling is. He even read a bunch of quotes from it. Really nice stuff done here as well. The thing is it always seems like when the media puts conservatives on the air they find the dumbest and ugliest among us and then try to get them mad and paint our side in that light.

I know a lot of people are getting tired of me saying our side and their side but that’s how it is. There is no getting along with them. That’s what I and the rest on my side are tired of. We have been trying to get along for a century. Well that’s over. I won’t be happy until they’re all gone out of this country and back to Libya or where ever the heck they think is gay enough for them because I won’t let it be here. Now, to make sure that happens, we need to go here, to our Senators (the more liberal the better) and tell them to vote for repealing this obamanation that is obamacare. You might want to ask them to get some of this buying a gun legislation going too. Until next time, screw environmentalists.

Lame Duck

December 20, 2010

Let me start by apologizing. I’m sorry for not letting you know these things, I just assume that everyone knows what I know, but I have had an alarming number of people ask me what a “lame duck” is. In politics a “lame duck” is a politician who has been voted out but is still in office. I know what you’re thinking, how can that be? Well here’s the skinny. When we have an election in November (and sometimes even earlier in the primary) where a certain liberal will be soundly trounced at the ballot box. His successor will be taking office in as much as three months, giving the current buffoon that much time to do as they please because they are already out and have nothing to lose.

Now, that in itself is pretty bad but it gets worse. These “lame ducks” become targets for special interests because they are going to be looking for work in a little while. Are you naive enough to believe that none of them have ever traded legislation for a cushy position in a few weeks? Now let me clarify something I’ve already said, the “lame duck” can be of any political persuasion but they just always seem to be liberals that are doing these things.

Another scenario is something like the case of Harry Reid. He’s old. He may just want out. Cha-ching. A one time lump sum settlement from the homo lobbyist may be just what he’s looking for to…let’s say vote for repealing Clinton’s don’t ask, don’t tell law. Are you starting to get the picture? It’s kind of like the “Girls Gone Wild” video only with politicians drunk with power. Power that they have usurped from you and I. And they know that we know and that we are going to do something about it so they are cramming as much of their decadent crap down our throats as they can before we oust them.

Now don’t despair, much of this crap can be repealed and the rest can be dealt with in other ways. But one thing you can do now is contact your own particular weird and/or lame duck and let them know how you feel. Perhaps enough hate mail will get their attention, but the best strategy is to always look at the long view when you go to the voting booth. Don’t look for the jackal that will give you the freebie now and leave you with a huge bill later. Look for the candidate that will do the right thing every time. My biggest regret is voting for a third-party candidate last round and leaving the conservative out in the wind. I know that if McCain were in charge we may not be happy but we would not be looking for refuge in other places…just in case. But what’s done is done and we move on. Until next time, screw environmentalists.


June 28, 2010

As a ship, capable of cleaning up Obama’s oil spill, steams its way to the gulf where it will probably not be allowed to help, Elena Kagan attempts to weasel her way into the nearly liberal body we call the Supreme Court. I say nearly liberal because they did uphold the Second Amendment today, 5-4.

5-4. Is that a true representation of the American people? I don’t mean the liberal urban hell where you stay, I mean all of America. Yes, if you live in Berkeley, California or Ann Arbor, Michigan, this probably is a true representation of the world as you know it. But beyond those “hallowed halls” of academia the sane world lurks waiting patiently for the libs to kill themselves off through stupidity like abortion and being unarmed in a dangerous world.

You might want to put a little more pressure on your liberal Senators regarding this Kagan thing. But back to the boat. The entire effort to clean this mess to date has yielded a little more than 600,000 barrels. The A-Whale is a converted tanker that can clean 500,000 barrels a day. Let’s see, 600,000 barrels in 60+ days or 500,000 barrels each and every day. I’ll take the A-Whale, pay the man Barry.

You may be wondering why Chairman Zero wouldn’t go for this. Well I’m glad you asked. You see, the A-Whale is owned by Taiwanese and fly’s a Liberian flag. I doubt if the flag or the owners bother Zero but they do bother his union buddies. Is that why Zero won’t wave the Jones Act. By the way, is that named for Ho Ho Ho Green Jobs Czar? Oh well, who needs the gulf anyway? We’ve got LA. To read about the A-Whale click here. Until next time, screw environmentalists.

2nd Amendment Still Under Assault

March 17, 2010

The State of Maine gave it a shot. They have legislation, LD1817, on the table that would allow law enforcement to confiscate firearms in domestic violence cases even if there was not even the threat of using the firearm.

A while ago I told you about an article in the American Thinker that mentioned a treaty that Chairman Zero may sign. It’s called the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT). The National Rifle Association-Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) has an article on that right now that makes me feel much better. According to the NRA-ILA there isn’t even a draft yet and work will continue on it until 2012 when we can ditch Chairman Zero.

Actually it seems like things are going quite well on this front. the guns confiscated in New Orleans can be retrieved by following the instructions at this link. And we can once again carry in National Parks. All in all not too bad.

While this is all good news let’s not forget that H.R.45, H.R.257 and S.1317 are still lingering out there. At any rate let’s sit back and wait for the Supreme Court decision on the Chicago Gun case. And, as always, screw environmentalists.

Obama For 2nd Amendment

March 9, 2010

Or is he? While we sit around like the accused at a felony trial waiting on the Supreme Court to issue its decision what else has been going on? An article by Anthony W. Hager in the American Thinker sums it up nicely. H.R. 45? Still hanging around. H.R. 257? Up and coming. S. 1317? What the heck is that? Better have a look because it could be misconstrued to apply to you, also, I believe it’s unconstitutional.

All very lethal pieces of “legislation” for the 2nd Amendment but nothing compared to the piece of… the treaty that Chairman Zero is planning to sign with the communists at the UN. Mr. Hager, in his article doesn’t give it much mention, or respect, but a piece of crap like this could make it very uncomfortable for us until our individual States stand up to the feds via 10th Amendment legislation. And this would be a worldwide thing with our communist Kenyan Presidents signature on it. Could Interpol show up at your door? I don’t know. Anyway, until next time, screw environmentalists.

EPA’s Back-Door Regulations

March 4, 2010

The first thing that grabs my attention is why would the Supreme Court have anything to do with “compelling the EPA to begin regulating greenhouse gases”? Anyway, in 2007 they did just that so the EPA will release regulations at the end of the month for vehicles and over the next two years for “stationary sources”. Will that be including congress?

At any rate this got Democratic Senator John Rockefeller’s thong in a wad so he “crafted” some legislation that will “safeguard jobs, the coal industry, and the entire economy”. Really? The entire economy, not just part of it? That’s awesome. What a god among lawmakers. A true inspiration for them all. Funny thing, today I was listening to Senator Jim DeMint on the Glenn Beck Show and Beck called him Jim, immediately apologized and called him Senator, to which DeMint replied, “That’s OK, I worked real hard for the name Jim.” I almost died laughing.

Meanwhile, back in thongwad land a host of gods among lawmakers have “crafted” legislation similar to the great JR’s. Among them such all time favorites as Mary Landrieu and Ben Nelson of Louisiana Purchase and Cornhusker Kickback fame. The question that comes to mind here is what does this global warming scam really mean to these people? Are you beginning to see the whole picture here? Until next time, screw environmentalists.

Chicago Gun Case

March 3, 2010

Oh my! I am ready to pass out. I can’t believe what I am hearing. The Supreme Court has redeemed itself and will once again be capitalized in this blog. There appears to be no part of “shall not be infringed” that they are having trouble understanding. According to an article from the Chicago Tribune most of the Supreme Court Justices are ready to strike down state and local laws infringing on our 2nd Amendment right.

This is music to my ears. The article goes on to lament how this will open up the courts to cases challenging many local laws (YES). With this ruling, Algore and cap-and-trade withering, and Obama less popular than Larry Flint I may not have anything more to write about. I might have to enjoy life again, what a shame. I just wanted to get a quick note out on this. We are still waiting for official word but it looks good for the good guys. Until next time, screw environmentalists.


February 9, 2010

After little Barry and Rahm and the rest of the chess club rejects got their booty kicked at recess they decided to make some laws to punish the other kids but the other kids just laughed and threw snowballs at them. Now even some of the chess club rejects have started standing up to them so what will they do now? Let’s watch…

Just trying my hand at a little screenplay here but really that’s music to my ears. What we have here is States telling the federal gubmint that they do not recognize their self-appointed authority. So what will Rahm and Barry do? There really is nothing they can do. They are wrong and even a poor lawyer, such as Obama, can see that.

Montana started with a plan to have a “squeaky clean” Montanan send a note to the ATF telling them that he is going to manufacture and sell guns without federal dealership licensing. Then when Elliot Ness tells them it is illegal they will sue and take it to the Supreme Court. Montana, Texas, and Alaska have similar laws in the works that will address this overreaching of the feds. I tell you this Obama Presidency is the best thing that ever happened. Seriously, do you think we would be having all this great stuff going on if we still had a limp-wristed Republican like Bush in there? I love it when a plan comes together.

Read more about Montana’s plan here.

Gun Grabbing In Texas

January 26, 2010

Well, I wanted to write about the Chicago gun case before the Supreme Court but the only thing I could find is that Los Angeles has joined with Chicago. What a shock. But that’s not even on the docket yet. The case number by the way is 08-1497 for those of you who want to keep track for yourself. The Supreme Court’s web site is . Just enter that case number on the docket search.

What I did run into during the course of my research was an incident in Texas. Apparently the Austin PD and the ATF decided to harass people selling guns in the parking lot at a gun show. Now in Texas this is fine and dandy. No one was breaking any laws but that didn’t detour the troops from doing their best to break it up. For a liberal slant on this from the ABC news affiliate Austin check this and watch the video .

Now the mouthpiece for the “authorities” claims they are trying to stop the flow of weapons into Mexico which, as we all know, is bunk. And the liberal media tried to paint it as a civil dispute between the property owner and the gun show owner but I didn’t find any statement anywhere from the property owner. Besides which he is legally renting his hall to someone who is doing a legal business, I have never heard of a landlord having a problem with that.

Folks, it all boils down to one thing, SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.