Posts Tagged ‘political correctness’

PC In The Crosshairs

February 24, 2011

Well, after yesterdays whack rant I was compelled to come back today and see if I couldn’t carry it too far. The “stresser”, as they call it on the cop shows, that set me off was a bit on the Limbaugh show a few days ago. Just a line or two and I don’t even remember what it related to, but the point is Limbaugh was acting like he was afraid to say weapon. Of course he wasn’t, and he was just making his point, as I am, but it set me off. So, I guess he did his job, now I’m trying to do mine and sound the alarm. Hey. Everybody. It’s getting bad. Time to stop these limp-wristed libs.

So now that everybody’s been thoroughly schooled on WHAT PC is. And now that everybody’s been thoroughly schooled on HOW TO AVOID the vilifying thing. And now that the alarm has been sounded. I would just like to spit out some vile politically incorrect things. Things like GUN. BULLET. WEAPON. CROSSHAIRS. TARGET. See that here. Yes. These things have been put on the PC list.

I know what you’re thinking…WTF? I don’t know either but in the spirit of civility I would like to say that I have put the crosshairs on all libs out there who support this PC crap. I have made them a target for conservatives everywhere. I would like to see them defeated where ever they are. Gee, I was starting to scare myself there. But seriously folks, I would not be surprised if some liberal whack job leaves venomous comments or even tries to have me arrested for some kind of hate crime for this. I will keep you posted on that. And yes, I will ok the venomous comments for publishing. I, unlike my lib counterparts, wouldn’t think of censoring opposing viewpoints.

But back to the point. Yes, gun, bullet, weapon, crosshairs and target have been deemed politically incorrect by the limp-wristed libs. I don’t know who, or how they would offend someone but none-the-less… So, if you value your freedom, I would suggest that you step up the use of these terms and try to apply them to everything you say. Now let me see, in other words, if you want to be as free as a bullet fired from a gun you should target terms that reflect your love of freedom and put the crosshairs on anything that stands in the way of you hitting this target. Now choose your weapon and get to work. Until next time, screw environmentalists.

Let’s All Be PC

February 23, 2011

To be politically correct let’s go to the online encyclopedia thing right here and see what they recommend. I’m not quite sure what that was all about but we sure don’t want to offend anyone so let’s push on. Here‘s the lowdown from one of those online answer things. Did you understand that one? There was something in there about homos I think, but I still don’t really understand what it is they’re hoping to accomplish. Ok, this one is a little more “R” rated but I understand it.

In “Political Correctness” by Philip Atkinson it’s refered to as a “communal tyranny that erupted in the eighties”, see that here. Yes, I seem to remember this coming into existence in the eighties and nobody listened or cared, they must have persevered. Basically it sounds like a way to try to restrict freedom of speech. “To prevent people from being offended.” that’s the rational for this transgression? To prevent people from being offended? Well they’ve failed miserably because I am quite offended by the whole charade. And sick of it as well.

Atkinson continues about the majority of citizens becoming selfish but I think it’s a small percentage of the people here trying to coerce the rest into going along with their gay BS. See, now that right there was NOT politically correct. I may have offended some of these fag bags by calling them gay. Or is it the other way around? I so don’t care. I am just trying to highlight the stupidity of the whole thing right here so that we don’t go ahead and make some un Constitutional laws (hate crimes), and then try to enforce them against an armed citizenry.

I think one of the best lines in Atkinson’s piece is, “The proponents of this social demolition achieve their irrational purpose by publicly embracing absurdity through slogans while vilifying any who do not support their stance. Vilifying. BINGO!  That’s the word. Vilifying any who do not support their stance. Bravo! There’s the phrase I have been searching for. That perfectly sums up what I have been trying to get across about this whole idea. Vilify. Yes, they “vilify”. That’s the only way they can force you to follow them. I wanted to say they “shame” you at one time but that was NOT correct because there was no shame in disagreeing with them. Ridicule was my next thought but still not quite on the mark. But vilify, yes, that’s exactly what they do. And it’s so simple to overcome, just walk away. To heck with them, just say no. That’s why they hate that slogan. Don’t buy into their BS. Now that I’ve solved that problem, until next time, screw environmentalists.

Hot Pants

December 28, 2009

So here we go again, due to our irrational fear of offending any mooslims we must now all drop our drawers and submit to a healthy groping by airport security before boarding the plane. Personally I don’t care because I swore off flying when they decided I couldn’t smoke for hours but the jerk behind me can bring his yapping mutt into my air space. Likewise I quit going to movie theaters. I am going to smoke before the end of the movie, so unless they want to pause the movie every hour for a break they can piss off. I’ll fly if I have to but if an alternative exists, that’s my plan.

For the rest of you who are not so easily offended might I suggest scrubs, no underwear and paper shoes. No carry-on, pay the fifteen dollars. But here’s my plan. Strip search every mooslim, or mooslim looking, individual that enters an airport. PROFILING IS RIGHT. Give law abiding citizens their guns back. Have a smoking flight. Give the crew guns and make sure they know how to use them. Make it part of the job and make them train every year and requalify like a cop.

I realize this is asking the libs to take a lot of steps backwards but then I’m sick and tired of trying to get along with libs. I WANT MY COUNTRY BACK. If you’re so excited about being Europe, move there.

Ft. Hood

November 13, 2009

Nidal Malik Hasan, I won’t address him by rank because he never earned it. This is a typical case of an individual being moved along because of his religion and ethnicity. Had he been a Christian he would have been discharged years ago and the media, if they said anything at all, would have made him out to be a madman. A religious zealot. Some kind of extremist. Well here’s how it’s shaking down. POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is biting us in the butt right now. Not in the future as everyone is fond of saying.

Nidal Malik Hasan is a madman, a religious zealot and an extremist. This was a hate crime if ever there was one. The B. Hussein Obama military and the government propaganda centers (ABC, CNN, MSNBC et al) are spinning this as not his fault. Write this down and store it away to be opened in two years. This man won’t do any time. After a short stay in the booby hatch, where he knows how the system works, he will be out on the street to pedal his brand of crazy again. You see, he never intended to survive. He was going to be a martyr and get his 73 virgins, but our touchy feely police foiled his plot and just crippled him.

No matter how you spin it this guy committed serious crimes. But that’s not what really bothers me about this whole mess. No, what really bothers me is that he’s being refered to by our liberal media as an “Army Phsychiatrist” instead of the radical mooslim terrorist that he is.

Cable

August 22, 2009

How many of you are old enough to remember when cable came to town? I would imagine not very many, but of those of you who do, what was the big selling point? They came to us with their hat in their hand and nearly begged us telling us that we would be able to watch programs uninterrupted by commercials if we just paid them? Say it in unison, “ Why yes Rick, I believe that was it.”

So what happened? I pay them what a man earned in a week in 1965 every month and I see more commercials now than I ever did in the sixties. I was watching a program from the “golden years of television” a while back and they had so many commercials that they had to shorten the program. It used to have a little blip at the end but they had to cut that out to make room for the butt machine ad or something. Between cutting the shows up for political correctness, commercialism and the out of this world cable bill, I rarely watch TV anymore.

And when did the networks all become such great friends. They used to compete for our viewing with good programming that we wanted to see, Now they not only have the same crap on that no one wants to see they also advertise for each other. But that’s ok, I can get two Spanish channels and the “all church all the time” network if I buy one of those converter boxes and a two hundred dollar antenna.

Hallelujah Senor! At least it’s free. Or, I could get a life.