Posts Tagged ‘Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’

Whack A Mole

March 2, 2010

Or in this case a rat, that’s right Algore surfaced so I’m swinging my mallet fast. He’s been reduced to writing Op-Ed pieces for the New York Times. Does anybody read that anymore unless it’s attached to a blog? Anyway this one sounds like he may have finally slipped away. He’s always doggedly trudged forward on his agenda but this time he really sounds out there with statements like, “…the reality of the danger we are courting has not been changed by the discovery of at least two mistakes in the thousands of pages of careful scientific work…”. TWO MISTAKES? CAREFUL SCIENTIFIC WORK? There’s two right there.

He goes on with gems like, “…e-mail messages stolen from the University of East Anglia in Britain showed that scientists besieged by an onslaught of hostile, make-work demands from climate skeptics may not have adequately followed the requirements of the British freedom of information law.” May not have adequately? They destroyed requested information.

But the clincher for me that told me he had completely lost it was, “…the panel’s scientists — acting in good faith on the best information then available to them — probably underestimated the range of sea-level rise in this century, the speed with which the Arctic ice cap is disappearing and the speed with which some of the large glacial flows in Antarctica and Greenland are melting and racing to the sea.” Has he not heard that the ice is thicker and larger than ever? I give up. this guy is beyond discredited and the New York Times can’t really slip any farther down in my opinion. My only question is are there really any pieces of this dead wild Mustang left to beat like this? Until next time, screw environmentalists.

It’s All About The Benjamins

February 16, 2010

What have I been saying for years? Follow the Benjamins. This global warming scam is nothing more than a plan to fleece the public and sure enough somebody else noticed. They didn’t just notice they kept on following.

Remember when our Congress bailed out AIG? They had to. Their insurance and retirement was tied up with them. Well the BBC has a similar situation going on with the global warming scam. That’s right their pension is tied up in the Institutional Investors Group on Climate Change (IIGCC) which is heavily into the United Nations Environment Program Finance Initiative (UNEP FI) who is wrapped up with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) who was recently exposed as a fraud.

As you can see it looks bad for his Lordship’s investments. As a result the BBC has been censoring climate skeptics. What does that sound like? A nice little article about this by John O’Sullivan at Climategate can be seen here. Mr. O’Sullivan goes on to name names of organizations such as some Catholic Diocese’ and other Churches that may have a conflict of interest here as well. Who isn’t capitalizing on this scam? Just you and me? If you have the time be sure to check out Mr. O’Sullivans article at Climategate. Until next time, screw environmentalists.

Climate Change – The Saga Continues

November 23, 2009
Not to blow my own horn, but I have been adamant about this crap since the seventies. When I was young and they were spewing about the coming ice age I recall asking someone, it may have been my Grandma, about it and they told me that it was much colder some years earlier when they were young and that this was nothing. I checked, as best you could in the seventies, and found that they were right. Later I heard of Niagra Falls freezing solid in about 1910 and I remember thinking that it really must have been cold.

Niagra Falls Circa 1908
Just so you don’t think I’m completely full of it here is photographic evidence not computer generated (unlike Algore). At any rate, the point of this post is that someone has hacked the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia and made public hundreds of e-mails where these giant brains were calling skeptics names and discussing ways to keep their lie from the people. At least they had the gonads to admit that the e-mails were authentic when confronted with them.
Now, I’m not claiming that e-mails from a bunch of lieing scientists is proof positive of the lie but it’s pretty damning wouldn’t you agree? Especially since these scientists are associated with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), the very body that has been holding this whole scam together recently. I won’t bore you with the details you can read the New York Times and the New American articles below. Enjoy a freer world thanks to the perserverance of those who have fought this fight long and hard.
Now, on to gun control. 

Ocean Cycles

October 10, 2009

As carbon dioxide (what you breath out and the trees breath in) continues to rise in our atmosphere global temperatures have not increased, this is from the climate correspondent for BBC News, Paul Hudson. How can this be? Scientist Piers Corbyn says that solar charged particles are almost entirely responsible for global temperatures. Can he be right? Research conducted two years ago by the Royal Society ruled out solar influences, Hudson wrote.

Professor Don Easterbrook from Western Washington University says the oceans and global temperatures are connected. He says the oceans have a 30 year cycle in which they warm and cool and the most important one is the Pacific decadal oscillation which is now cooling. Sounds reasonable, right? But the UK Met Office’s Hadley Centre says the long term trend in global temperatures is clearly up. Does this refute Easterbrook’s conclusions? Mojib Latif, a member of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change says that we may be in a 10-20 year period of cooling. He believes that this cooling will be temporary and then we’ll go right back to man-made global warming.

This all reminds me of that old television program “Soap” where when it first came on they made a bunch of crazy statements and then said, “Confussed? You won’t be after this episode.” The problem is this ain’t television and with each episode we get more confussed. My question to you is, is this speculation and contradiction worth destroying our way of life and our economy over, or should we wait until we know what the heck we are doing?