Posts Tagged ‘CNN’

Ft. Hood

November 13, 2009

Nidal Malik Hasan, I won’t address him by rank because he never earned it. This is a typical case of an individual being moved along because of his religion and ethnicity. Had he been a Christian he would have been discharged years ago and the media, if they said anything at all, would have made him out to be a madman. A religious zealot. Some kind of extremist. Well here’s how it’s shaking down. POLITICAL CORRECTNESS is biting us in the butt right now. Not in the future as everyone is fond of saying.

Nidal Malik Hasan is a madman, a religious zealot and an extremist. This was a hate crime if ever there was one. The B. Hussein Obama military and the government propaganda centers (ABC, CNN, MSNBC et al) are spinning this as not his fault. Write this down and store it away to be opened in two years. This man won’t do any time. After a short stay in the booby hatch, where he knows how the system works, he will be out on the street to pedal his brand of crazy again. You see, he never intended to survive. He was going to be a martyr and get his 73 virgins, but our touchy feely police foiled his plot and just crippled him.

No matter how you spin it this guy committed serious crimes. But that’s not what really bothers me about this whole mess. No, what really bothers me is that he’s being refered to by our liberal media as an “Army Phsychiatrist” instead of the radical mooslim terrorist that he is.

Czars

September 11, 2009

The questions are starting to be asked. How many czars does he have? Who do they answer to? Who is paying them?

Well, David Gergen, a CNN contributor and former aide to past presidents said, “Now with President Obama, we have a number of people who answer to the president but not to Congress. When the Congress looks at it and sees over 30 people with czar titles, it naturally begins to worry that a lot of authority has been taken away and stripped of the Cabinet.” So apparently he has over thirty czars, I have heard 32-37 thrown around. You just can’t find an accurate count anywhere and it seems to change daily.

Dana Perino, a White House spokeswoman for the Bush administration, told Fox News that, “Presidents like to appoint czars because it can be hard to get political appointees confirmed by an increasingly partisan Congress. They have skirted around that process so there is no accountability for the czars. Nobody has to go up and testify in front of Congress. They don’t have to go through the process.” So they answer only to the President would be the answer I derive to our second question.

As for the last question you already know the answer, don’t you? It’s the same poor schmucks who are paying for the thirty handmaidens for Michelle. You and I, my friend. You and I. Chairman Zero is not the first President to have czars (their officail title is advisor) they have been around for decades in both parties. I think the real question here is are they Constitutional and legal? If so let’s move on and concentrate on something else.